Our Approach
Every engagement follows a structured methodology. Not because process is the goal, but because disciplined execution prevents the failures we have seen too many times.
Delivery Phases
Six phases, each with defined activities and artifacts. Phases can be compressed or expanded based on scope, but the structure remains consistent.
Diagnose
Understand the current state, define success criteria, and identify risks before committing to a plan.
Key Activities
- Stakeholder interviews and requirements workshops
- Current-state system and process documentation
- Gap analysis against target state
- Risk identification and initial mitigation planning
- Success criteria definition with measurable acceptance
Artifacts
- Stakeholder map
- Current-state assessment
- Requirements document
- Risk register (initial)
Design
Document everything before building. Configuration decisions, integration specifications, data mappings, and security model - all written down and approved.
Key Activities
- Configuration design aligned to requirements
- Integration specification and sequencing
- Data mapping with transformation rules
- Security and access model design
- Test strategy and scenario development
Artifacts
- Configuration workbook
- Integration specifications
- Data mapping document
- Security model documentation
- Test plan
Build
Iterative configuration and development with regular checkpoints. No surprises at the end.
Key Activities
- System configuration per approved design
- Integration development with error handling
- Data migration scripting and dry runs
- Unit testing of components
- Regular demo and feedback cycles
Artifacts
- Configured system (non-production)
- Working integrations (test environment)
- Migration scripts with validation
- Unit test results
Prove
Testing happens here, not in production. User acceptance, integration testing, parallel runs, and reconciliation.
Key Activities
- User acceptance testing with business users
- End-to-end integration testing
- Parallel payroll runs with reconciliation
- Performance and load testing (if applicable)
- Defect triage and resolution
Artifacts
- UAT sign-off
- Integration test results
- Parallel run reconciliation reports
- Defect log with resolution status
Launch
Cutover execution with go/no-go checkpoints. Rollback plan ready. Data validated. Integrations verified.
Key Activities
- Cutover rehearsal in production-like environment
- Go/no-go checkpoint with stakeholders
- Data migration execution with validation
- Integration activation and verification
- Hypercare support during initial operations
Artifacts
- Cutover plan with timing and owners
- Rollback procedures
- Go-live checklist
- Data validation reports
- Hypercare log
Harden
Transition to steady-state operations. Monitoring, runbooks, and knowledge transfer so your team owns it.
Key Activities
- Monitoring implementation and threshold tuning
- Runbook development for operations and incidents
- Knowledge transfer sessions with internal team
- Handoff documentation and sign-off
- Post-implementation review
Artifacts
- Monitoring dashboard or checklist
- Operations runbook
- Incident response procedures
- Knowledge transfer materials
- Handoff acceptance
Risk Management Posture
We build controls into the delivery process. These are not overhead - they are how we prevent the failures that derail projects.
Ownership is explicit
Every decision, risk, and deliverable has a named owner. Ambiguity in ownership is a project risk we eliminate early.
Controls before velocity
We establish checkpoints and approval gates. Moving fast without controls creates technical debt and audit exposure.
Change is managed
Scope changes go through a defined process. Impact is assessed, documented, and approved before implementation.
Decisions are auditable
We maintain decision logs with rationale. When someone asks why something is built a certain way, there is a documented answer.
Standard Artifacts
These documents are produced on every engagement. The format adapts to client standards, but the content is non-negotiable.
| Artifact | Purpose | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements Document | Defines what needs to be built | Diagnose |
| Configuration Workbook | Documents all system settings | Design |
| Data Mapping | Source-to-target field mapping with rules | Design |
| Integration Specifications | Technical specs for each integration | Design |
| Test Plan | Scenarios, data, and acceptance criteria | Design |
| Cutover Plan | Sequenced activities with timing and rollback | Prove |
| Reconciliation Reports | Proof that data matches expected state | Prove |
| Operations Runbook | Day-to-day procedures for steady state | Harden |
| Monitoring Checklist | What to watch and when to escalate | Harden |
Questions about our process?
We are happy to walk through how this applies to your specific situation. No commitment required.
Start a conversationWe will tell you if we are not the right fit.